MICHELE APOLOGIZE IF the gentleman ("the anonymous merge" ... no?).
I dedicate this to the last comment written by the group board, which had the availability half-page each.
FUTURE AND FREEDOM ': the new council group is formed by two city councilors who, last November, detached from "Together for Merge" to give visibility to the eponymous party led by President of the Chamber of Deputies, on . Gianfranco Fini. E 'therefore understandable that the newspaper had used to talk about this event, ignoring all the problems local authorities. But not quite correct, given the nature of the magazine. On the other hand have prevented attacks and polemics.
TOGETHER FOR MERGO : List of the majority has given an example of how NOT should be used the local newspaper. The article, however, totally ignores the problems municipalities and is concentrated in an attack on myself, considered "the" (their) enemies, political and personal.
Words are shaken like a club. Ooze malice. Perhaps envy. Certainly evil and wants to hurt. The reluctance el'allusione heavy border on slander and defamation. A small but telling detail: the article is unsigned, is anonymous . Whoever wrote it did not have the moral courage to put his face and take responsibility. Bravely ... has thrown the stone and hid her hand.
Saturday I met by chance in the Square, the new leader of the list, Mr. Michael Gatta, and I asked him on behalf of that 'article. Michael told me that he wrote the words and added that the attack does not agree with people, it was justified by his inexperience. He seemed sincere. In the end I apologized.
It would have been better if she had persuaded his colleague for some time group to be more correct, but I appreciated the gesture and accepted that apology.
If I think that Mr. Gatta is certainly a gentleman, not as I say "him or them Gentlemen," which also takes a critical but on facts, opinions or ideas, personal openly but prefer to insult and denigrate the staff behind the screen of anonymity!
These behaviors reveal a poverty of ideas and arguments, but perhaps something different and worse.
the merits, I should tell my brief case of political experience and institutional, reassure the "anonymous", now in over 35 years has seen the heavy commitment of both the benches of the opposition and those of the government. It has however taken place at levels far more challenging than merging, the boundaries that I think my "anonymous censor" never came out.
As for my attendance at meetings of the City Council, by an ordinary citizen, after his resignation as alderman, dates almost one year ago, I understand that might bother him, but will have to resign. Telling those sessions on this website, is for me a way to continue to serve my fellow citizens, starting with those who in 2009 gave us confidence. Who do not understand, I wonder. For
DEMOCRATS FOR MERGO dedicate your next comment, 10th and last.
The PD, in fact, has, among other things, a serious problem: what should be the character and quality of the opposition today to become a government force tomorrow. Theme that is present in the small company by merging, but also and more generally in the country. Issue that can not be stored with the parade of a pointless opinionated enough, or liquidate with a few jokes. We'll talk about ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment